Why Mad Max 1979 movie reviews are so positive

0

Decades after Mad Max’s original release, the film remains a dystopian action classic. Here’s why George Miller’s starter franchise endured.

Directed by George Miller, Max Max has endured the test of time and remains a universally beloved film. The dystopian classic lacks the most intricate storylines and was not fully received when it was first released in 1979, but spectacular road streaks and dynamic center performance have maintained its popularity over the years.

Mad Max stars a young Mel Gibson as Max Rockatansky, a main force patrol officer who stalks villains and outlaw bikers. He drives a custom Pursuit Special and wears a smooth leather uniform. It’s a punk rock take on the proverbial Man In Black – someone who plays by his own rules and whose life is marred by tragedy. Mad Max is full of iconic quotes, as well as violent footage that may be impossible to watch for some viewers. Miller’s film becomes even more shocking by the final act, as Max embarks on a vendetta of revenge against the men who have attacked his family.


Related: The Mad Max Movies Ranked From Worst To Best

Mad Max currently holds a 90 percent Tomatometer score on Rotten Tomatoes, based on 61 reviews. The audience score is just under 70 percent, based on over 140,000 ratings. Overall, critics seem to appreciate the dystopian vibe and the way the making of the film underscores the danger inherent in this particular world. Fans can argue that to fully appreciate Mad Max, we must accept all the ugly violence it contains. It’s that sense of brutalism that allows for some of the film’s most mind-boggling moments, which in turn benefit the main character’s overall arc. In general, Mad Max offers a memorable cinematic experience, much like revisiting Miller’s story in 2015 Mad Max: Fury Road. Here are some of the more glowing reviews.

The Boston Globe:

“If punk is a sensibility as much as an adjective, Mad Max is a punk film. Its Australian decor highlights it, authenticating its futuristic aura.

Variety:

“The stunts themselves would be nothing without a filmmaker behind the camera and George Miller, doctor and film buff directing his first feature film, shows he knows what cinema is.”

Sequart:

“There is something about Mad Max… that has allowed it to stand the test of time, not only as a work of art in itself, but also as a name and brand that commands the coin. cultural thirty years after the last appearance of the character. “

Time magazine:

“[The] the film was consigned to the Grinding Houses, where audiences react as Miller wishes. From there, Mad Max will find his way to film schools and revival houses, where his edgy intelligence can be appreciated. “

Antagonia & Ecstasy:

“His perhaps unwarranted narrative shortcuts hardly seem worth complaining about amid his flawless action sequences.”

Mad Max may indeed be popular all over the world, but critics have consistently pointed out many of the obvious flaws. The main complaint is that Miller’s story is pretty basic, which fans can argue is indeed the point for accessibility purposes. Critics have also rightly denounced violence, even though it is central to Miller’s overall vision. Some of the images are pretty gruesome, but the camera implied a graphic visual without showing it (like Alfred Hitchcock’s iconic shower scene in psychopath). Here are some of the more negative critical comments that Mad Max has received.

The New York Times:

“Mad Max is ugly and inconsistent, and targets, probably accurately, the less critical moviegoers.”

The Blu spot:

“Although Mad Max has been hailed as a classic by some, it becomes apparent that this reputation is not fully deserved thanks to a rudimentary plot that doesn’t even fill 90 minutes and a slow pace that will leave viewers struggling to understand. to stay awake.”

People magazine:

“[Max’s] his weapon is a bloated car, which sets up chase scenes that make The Dukes of Hazzard look like a hay ride – a feat director George Miller crafted on a meager budget of $ 1 million. Dramatically, however, the film is inconsistent. “

The spectator:

“Suffers from a case of terminal fatigue.

There are certainly valid reviews of Mad Max, but critics and moviegoers still seem to love it after all these years. And given the overwhelming love for Mad Max: Fury Road, we clearly haven’t seen the Last of this World yet.

More: How Mel Gibson’s Mad Max Connects To Tom Hardy’s In Fury Road

Every Venom Movie Ranked Does Venom Let There Be Spiderman Carnage 3

Every Venom Movie Ranked (Including Spider-Man 3)


About the Author


Source link

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.